Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

In Which Situations Is Antiplatelet Therapy Justified?

0
Posted

In Which Situations Is Antiplatelet Therapy Justified?

0

Since the end of the 1970s, though convincing studies were lacking, it has become a rule to treat any patient with cerebrovascular disease with an antiplatelet such as aspirin or dipyridamole. Subsequently, numerous studies demonstrated a moderate effect of these drugs for the secondary prevention of stroke. On average, antiplalelet therapies decrease the absolute risk of any ulterior vascular event by 2-3%, which represents a decrease of relative risk of about one quarter. The relative risk of death (whatever the cause) decreases by 17%. Therefore, it is justified to give such a treatment to any patient with a cerebrovascular event (transient ischemic attack (TIA), regressive ischemic neurological disease (RIND) or stroke). More-over, the International Stroke Trial (1ST) and Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CAST), demonstrated that antiplatelet therapy (specifically aspirin), when begun within the 48 h following stroke, diminishes the risk of a new stroke and death in the following 14 days

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123