In what ways are BioVigilant’s IMD instruments preferred to conventional plate culturing methods and “rapid methods”?
The primary ways in which BioVigilant’s IMD instruments are preferred to conventional plate culturing methods and rapid methods are: 1) time from measurement to results is virtually zero; 2) monitoring can be continuous as opposed to episodic; 3) in most cases, there is minimal or no time required to set up the sample; and, 4) there is minimal human intervention.
Related Questions
- What is the chance that two or more separate microbes will pass through BioVigilant’s IMD instruments so closely together that they may inaccurately be counted as one larger particulate?
- Are there any recent technical advances that have made it possible for BioVigilant to create IMD instruments?
- Can BioVigilant’s IMD instruments tell difference between live and freshly killed microbes?
