In the first cycle, an institution had to have a “periodic”evaluation of its rules-compliance program. Has this changed for the second cycle?
Division I institutions should note that in accordance with NCAA Bylaw 22.2.1.3-(e), all institutions must undergo a comprehensive evaluation of their rules-compliance programs by an authority external to the department of intercollegiate athletics. The NCAA Division I Committee on Athletics Certification defines the term “external” as an individual or office that is outside of the athletics department, has no daily responsibilities in any of the areas of rules compliance, and possesses sufficient knowledge of the critical and sensitive areas of rules compliance. Some examples of evaluators the committee has accepted include an office of internal audit, conference office or the NCAA staff. In addition, the committee has accepted evaluations performed by other entities, provided the reviewer meets all of the provisions stated above. Effective immediately for all schools, the committee will hold institutions accountable for the requirement that the outside rules compliance evaluation sha
Related Questions
- Must the evaluation of an institutions rules-compliance program be completed prior to the committee making a certification decision?
- May the peer-review team perform the required evaluation of the rules-compliance program during the evaluation visit?
- How has Medicaid managed care changed since the State began its program in 1997?
