Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

In moral perspective, can the difference of right and wrong be democratically ruled ?

0
Posted

In moral perspective, can the difference of right and wrong be democratically ruled ?

0

In a secular world, yes. Post-war Humanists have found a simple principle for moral governance : They have introduced devils among the humans, i.e. Nazis, non-democratic citizens, supporters of patriarchy. Those who hate the devils possess the right moral. Even Christians have been fooled. They have always been taught to hate the Devil, and feel since WWII free to hate humans. Christians seem not to be aware of the mishmash of metaphysics and immanence inherent in Humanistic morals. Once the Humanists and other democratic Westerners are assured of being morally correct, they feel that they have the mission to go for global conquest. They are servants of materialistic oligarchs who need global market. With the Materialists’ victory of 1945 the English empire was modernized, in the interest of the US.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123