in evidence which disproves Copernicus concepts?
A1: First and foremost it’s the humiliation that it puts upon these maladroit derelicts. Mine isn’t “name-calling” at all, but is assigning English dictionary terms to these bungling fools. Their chronic and conspicuous refusals to address the actual facts testify to their incompetence. Why anyone would openly ignore incontrovertible evi- dence is probably due to the fact that they are too embarrassed to do otherwise. Shame is shame. They do not want to admit that they’ve been had. Anyway you cut it, it’s desertion on their part. What little intelligence they have’s overridden by their deplorable refusal to address evidence.
