Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Im not crazy about this whole “party list” concept. If parties got to choose who went on their lists, wouldn that end up turning into a patronage factory, giving us a bunch of lousy MPs?

0
Posted

Im not crazy about this whole “party list” concept. If parties got to choose who went on their lists, wouldn that end up turning into a patronage factory, giving us a bunch of lousy MPs?

0

It could happen that way, but it wouldn’t have to. A look at the world’s electoral systems provides us with a whole bunch of different ways of compiling party lists without backroom jockeying. An “open list” would allow voters to arrange the order of list candidates. A “zippered list” would require every other candidate to be a woman, and serve to make Parliament more gender-representative. A list could be assembled through primary elections, or be composed of those who ran in riding elections but lost by a tiny portion of the vote. It could be assembled at the regional or even the local level, perhaps by riding associations instead of by those at the top. With so many choices, surely we’d be able to find something that would be right for Canada.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123