If we must cut greenhouse gas emissions, why not just go straight to low or no-carbon options like nuclear, hydrogen, and renewables?
The magnitude of greenhouse gas emissions that must be offset to achieve atmospheric stabilization is daunting and requires that all options jointly contribute toward this reduction. Sequestration and a host of other greenhouse gas mitigation options, as well as adaptive measures, must be aggressively explored in parallel so that the best mix of cost-effective solutions are found. What capture technology can be used at my local power plant? In the future, emerging R&D will provide numerous cost effectives technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from power plants. At present, however, state-of-the-art technologies for existing power plants are essentially limited to “amine absorbents”. Such amines are used extensively in the petroleum refining and natural gas processing industries. The process works as follows. Flue gas that would normally go out the stack is bubbled through a solution of water and amines. The amines in the water react with the carbon dioxide in the flue gas to form a
Related Questions
- What is the contribution of nuclear energy to mitigating the problems associated with greenhouse gas emissions and consequent global warming?
- If we must cut greenhouse gas emissions, why not just go straight to low or no-carbon options like nuclear, hydrogen, and renewables?
- Aren there greenhouse gas emissions in the production of hydrogen?
