If the sins of the son could not affect the soul of deceased father how the sanskars of the loanee father are wiped out by the act of repayment of loans by his son?
The reason why the son had repaid the loan is he is the beneficiary of that loan. When the son could inherit the property associated with the loans taken by his father who else other than son should repay it? The receiver of the benefit (son here) should repay. This is the rule of human society. However this rule is not observed in many countries. There are no joint families in these countries. They take care of their children until the latter acquire the strength to live independently. Once the children become strong to be independent enough, they are separated and relations between them become nominal. Here nobody is indebted to the other. No question of payment/non-payment of Loan arises here. The loanee is alone accountable for the loan taken by him. That the son is an inheritor of the property is the underlying reason why the son should repay the amount borrowed by his father. If there were to be no such rule then there is no reason why the son should repay the amount borrowed by
Related Questions
- Im a single mother of three (father deceased) and my youngest son has ADHD and has great difficulty in making friends. What SAFE websites can a teen guy go to get advice for making friends, meeting girls and relationships?
- If the sins of the son could not affect the soul of deceased father how the sanskars of the loanee father are wiped out by the act of repayment of loans by his son?
- What is the WARN Act and how might it affect me?
