Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If the 17(d)(1) withdrawals are revoked, would that make lands within the planning area available for mineral development?

0
Posted

If the 17(d)(1) withdrawals are revoked, would that make lands within the planning area available for mineral development?

0

Lifting the (d)(1) withdrawals, as recommended by the Proposed RMP, would open the lands to leasable and locatable minerals. In some cases, lifting the (d)(1) withdrawals may have not immediate effect. For example, lands selected by ANCSA corporations and the State of Alaska remain “segregated” (unavailable) to leasable or locatable mineral entry. On unencumbered BLM-administered lands, mining activity could occur. Exploration and development activity would be guided by regulations and permit conditions to protect sensitive resources in the area. Additional NEPA analysis would take place prior to approval of most types of mining activity.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123