Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If so, should the harmonised limit be 3 months, 6 months, or another time period?

0
Posted

If so, should the harmonised limit be 3 months, 6 months, or another time period?

0

It has long been RMT policy that we argue for a harmonised time limit of six months. 20. Would total or partial harmonisation of the grounds for extension to the extent possible subject to legal constraints, be a helpful additional reform? The RMT contends that the “just and equitable” formula used in equality cases should be extended to all other cases. The “reasonably practicable” test has not been applied uniformly by Tribunals and in our view has prevented people obtaining justice. 21. If so, what should the grounds for extension be in respect of the relevant jurisdictions? See 20 above 22. Do employment tribunals provide the most appropriate way of resolving multiple-claimant claims, or could other mechanisms better serve the interests of all the parties involved? In equal pay claims, it would be reasonable for a trade union to lodge a claim on behalf of its members whom it would then cite. This would allow the case to be managed in a more efficient way. 23. Do you have views on w

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123