If RipOff Report Writes the Negative, Defamatory Titles and Stuffs Them With Keywords, Is That Enough to Make Them Liable for Defamation?
Arguably, yes. There is no agreement on this right now. Several courts have stated that if the plaintiffs can get evidence that RipOff Report is drafting defamatory titles, then there is a viable defamation claim and no immunity. Thus, if you’re going to sue RipOff Report, it is very important to allege that the website created and/or substantially altered the meaning of the content.1 You need to allege facts that get you around the CDA immunity provisions in order to avoid being thrown out of Court. There is more than just speculation that Magedson was involved in altering reports. The Declaration of Dickson Earl Woodard Deposition contains the sworn testimony of the Plaintiff’s former employee2 and states repeatedly that Magedson drafted fake complaints and manipulated search engines: Attorney: So what I’ve gathered from all of your testimony, Dickson, is that Ed Magedson has indirectly told you that he is responsible for making posts about companies. He will make these posts. Mr. Wo
Related Questions
- What happens if new, negative information - information that was not on my original report - is added to my report after Advanced Credit Repair has begun work on my behalf?
- What Does a Plaintiff Have to Prove to Hold RipOff Report Liable for a RICO Act Violation?
- How do you print credit amounts on the FSG Report as positive instead of negative numbers?
