If Our Undiscovered Universe is such an incredible scientific breakthrough, why wasn it published in a respected, peer-reviewed scientific journal?
Peer-reviewed physics journals are excellent venues for presenting new measurements, statistical analyses and mathematical models, but they are not designed to revisit long-standing interpretations of well known measurements. Journals are published by consensus. They reinforce the reigning paradigms; they do not publish papers that challenge paradigms.
Related Questions
- is such an incredible scientific breakthrough, why wasn it published in a respected, peer-reviewed scientific journal?
- Was this review an independent DoE assessment of the experiments and the published scientific literature?
- Have the ID critiques of evolutionary theory been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals?
