Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If each of the measures being studied through the MET project is validated against the standardized state test, isn that the same thing as just using the state test alone to judge the teacher?

0
Posted

If each of the measures being studied through the MET project is validated against the standardized state test, isn that the same thing as just using the state test alone to judge the teacher?

0

No. While the project values student learning gains and will test to determine to what extent the various measures correlate with student learning gains, the resulting composite measure of effective teaching will not simply mirror the test scores. There are three reasons why the Measures of Effective Teaching composite provides additional information and not just more data. • First, the project uses two forms of student assessment, not just the state standardized test, to measure achievement gains, which are intended to complement one another. The state test assesses the extent to which students learned the state curriculum. The supplemental assessment measures conceptually deeper student learning and problem-solving skills. • Second, even though each of the measures being tested through the project are validated against student learning gains on the two tests, each teacher’s individual results will vary in the extent to which the measures agree. It is possible, and likely, that teache

0

No. While the project values student learning gains and will test to determine to what extent the various measures correlate with student learning gains, the resulting composite measure of effective teaching will not simply mirror the test scores. There are three reasons why the Measures of Effective Teaching composite provides additional information and not just more data. • First, the project uses two forms of student assessment, not just the state standardized test, to measure achievement gains, which are intended to complement one another. The state test assesses the extent to which students learned the state curriculum. The supplemental assessment measures conceptually deeper student learning and problem-solving skills. • Second, even though each of the measures being tested through the project are validated against student learning gains on the two tests, each teacher’s individual results will vary in the extent to which the measures agree. It is possible, and likely, that teache

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123