If an HTS researcher carries a weapon, doesn’t that imply voluntary informed consent is not possible?
In an environment where most of the population is armed, an assumption that the presence of weapons automatically carries with it the threat of coercive force is simply incorrect. Local Iraqi and Afghan nationals who live in a war zone are smart enough to differentiate between combat forces and personnel who conduct non-combat functions.
Related Questions
- My neighbor carries HSA insurance but doesn’t participate in the hearings or really care about the day to day operations of HSA. Who will moderate his health care decisions on my behalf?
- If an HTS researcher carries a weapon, doesn’t that imply voluntary informed consent is not possible?
- If an HTS researcher carries a weapon, does that imply voluntary informed consent is not possible?
