Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If Ambisonics is so wonderful, why is it not a commercial success?

0
0 Posted

If Ambisonics is so wonderful, why is it not a commercial success?

0
0

We should first note that technical excellence and commercial success do not necessarily go hand-in-hand. This is why you are all watching VHS video tapes and not Betamax. Ambisonics has suffered from the following: • It came to market just as quadraphonics was dying away. Manufacturers had lost a bundle on quadraphonics and were not receptive to “yet another” surround sound system. • It was never supported by a major record company. The record majors had all backed different quadraphonic systems. • The rights were held by the National Research Development Corporation, now defunct. This was a sort of venture capital company, but one owned and run by the British government. The NRDC has little commercial nous. (Yes “nous”, look it up.) • Ambisonics is thought of as a “purist” technique and not applicable to multi-track studio recording. This fallacy is demolished by The Alan Parson’s Project Stereotomy, Arista 8384. • While Ambisonics can lend itself to the impressive ping-pung-pang-pon

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123