Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If a movie house was to feature a gory horror flick that would most certainly cause fear to a segment of the general public, would its proprietor be liable under this bill?

0
Posted

If a movie house was to feature a gory horror flick that would most certainly cause fear to a segment of the general public, would its proprietor be liable under this bill?

0

To proclaim that this bill intends to preserve peace and security is like burning a house down to prevent an arsonist from doing it himself. The bill claims to protect human rights but does exactly the opposite. In the end, Congress is not here to practice democracy, but merely preserve its trappings.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123