If a FTTP (fibre to the premises) solution does not offer any moreservices than we can get through a copper net–why then choose a more expensive FTTP solution?
A. The limits lie within the capacity of adding future services. At the same time, a copper net is more expensive to maintain than a fibre network. A fibre net can easily be upgraded with new services in an analogue/digital FTTP solution, and the capacity is practically unlimited. Actually, only your imagination sets limits to the supply of new services as for instance burglar alarm, surveillance of the houses in the owners’ association, reading of consumption of electricity and water, Video-on-Demand, teleconferencing, remote medicine, tele-education, entertainment, etc. A fibre solution gives you maximum flexibility in comparison to future needs, the right basis for a good cash flow and not to forget: satisfied customers now and in the future. Q.
Related Questions
- If a FTTP (fibre to the premises) solution does not offer any moreservices than we can get through a copper net–why then choose a more expensive FTTP solution?
- How is the wired digital media streamer solution with PowerLine HomePlug going to offer improved performance over wireless streamers?
- With FTTH, existing copper infrastructure will have to be replaced by fibre optic. Is n t too expensive?
