If a client came back to an RTO for a re-issue of a parchment, does the RTO issue an exact duplicate, using the same parchment format, or should it re-issue the parchment under the AQF?
A reissued certificate should be as consistent with the original as possible. The re-issued qualification should make it clear it is a duplicate of a formerly issued qualification. The duplicate should not claim to be AQF if the original was issued prior to its existence. This would be misleading. A qualification could only be issued under the AQF if the person was re-assessed in accordance with the AQF requirements. The RTO may consider adding a note to the re-issued document, e.g. “Original parchment issued 15 March 2000. This Duplicate copy issued 1 July 2008”.
Related Questions
- If a client came back to an RTO for a re-issue of a parchment, does the RTO issue an exact duplicate, using the same parchment format, or should it re-issue the parchment under the AQF?
- When I used the unit on my next client, black chunks immediately came out of the unit into the clear tap water. Why?
- Does my assembly code need to follow the exact format given in Lab 1?
