I wonder if the the WSJ knows information is bleeding out?
BTW, it looks like most of the WSJ traffic comes from various proxies at dowjones.com, so if you want to know if the WSJ is looking at your web pages, this is certainly a way … and they may want to consider some sort of anonymous proxy or off-site ISP to “cloak” the poking around that they do so webmasters don’t see ’em in their web servers logs. Ditto for organizations such as McGraw Hill, New York Times, and others. BTW, I could say a little bit more, but I like the WSJ (have subscribed for over 20 years), so I don’t want to give too many clues how people can tell if a story is coming their way! 😉 • I again hit the main page of Slashdot which posted the story at 1618 on Monday, December 27th, 2004. The “good news” (from a non-flash traffic point of view) is the article link was to the ABC-7 story – recall they were the ones who took me up in the helicopter … which was probably the “bad news” for me since their article was especially negative toward me, plus it said the Wall Str
