I thought EIS was all about “limited toolset” and “business analysis.” Isn Java just technology for technologys sake?
EIS stands by its belief that a limited but robust toolset is the most effective way to coordinate a decentralized, campus-wide computing function here at UT. Adding new technologies to this toolset is something that only happens if there is a real and imminent need, and if there has been sufficient research to support the addition. In the case of Java/Tamino, both these criteria have been satisfied. We are expanding the toolset, yes, but not indiscriminately – in fact, this expansion will give our business analysts who are trained in the technical toolset more flexibility and greater options as they address the business problems of their departments. Business analysis remains at the heart of why we do what we do. EIS is also committed to using technologies that are relevant and that support the mission of the University. For business analysts to do their jobs well, they need the right tools. We always want to avoid choosing technologies just because they’re trendy; in addition, we wou
Related Questions
- Can the newly announced technology be used to package software in the Java development environment - files like EARs and JARs, and so on?
- Will phoneME Advanced software be backwards-compatible with the Java technology implementation on existing phones?
- I thought EIS was all about "limited toolset" and "business analysis." Isn Java just technology for technologys sake?