Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I think most people mean financial sense. Lets put it another way: is it cheaper building a house yourself versus buying a house from a builder?

0
Posted

I think most people mean financial sense. Lets put it another way: is it cheaper building a house yourself versus buying a house from a builder?

0

This is a known fact that a house material to labour ratio is appoximately 40 to 60, that is 40% – material cost and 60% – other costs such as labour and builder marging. Builders of course, have wholesale advantage to an individual. They can buy materials cheaper, say 5 to 10 percent. Not a big deal. As I showed in Financing, I spent 50% on materials instead of 40% but I still saved 50% on a house by building it myself. I hope the reader understands that we are talking about cash here. If one takes borrowing of substantial amount of money into account, then savings are much bigger.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123