I received a document containing the following sentiments from a union officer Ive written too. What might be said in response?
(The below quoted text was sent to some who have made inquiry regarding this matter. We here take the opportunity to respond to each point while preserving the privacy of the parties who have written. Quoted material comes from a Pacific Union officer, regular text is our reaction to his remarks.) “As is so often the case, those not present at a meeting send their interpretation of events around the world as though it were fact.” Those not present have checked their facts with numerous people, including the Union president himself. The question is, are the facts or interpretation sound? What we have then is a pro interpretation versus a con interpretation. “_____ chaired the meeting, and what you describe is so far from what actually happened, I don’t even recognize it as the same meeting. Your letter is a gross distortion of fact. You do the church a real disservice to circulate this type of fiction around the country when you have obviously not checked with those present and certainl
Related Questions
- I ordered an item via text message, and received a response containing a link to what looks like a web link, but don know how to access it?
- I received a letter of violation, and have sent in the written response as instructed. How do I know when the violation is closed?
- Can we automatically send back a response for all messages received to a mailbox?
