I read somewhere that Kre-Alkalyn is supposed to be “10x More Effective” than regular creatine. Is this true?
It’s all in how you look at it. If unbuffered creatine degrades by 90% in liquid or stomach acids, then Kre-Alkalyn would be “10x more effective” since it remains 100% stable (100% vs. 10%). Unfortunately, many supplement companies falsely advertise that their creatine products force muscle cells to absorb creatine at levels far beyond their natural capacity. However, basic science tells us this is simply impossible. For example, you cannot force 14 ounces of water into an 8-ounce glass—100% capacity is 100% capacity. Furthermore, if someone could figure out a way to stabilize creatine other than manipulating its pH levels, the real question becomes this: Would it really work any better than Kre-Alkalyn? The key word to focus on here is “better”. Like I said above, once you’ve saturated your cells with creatine, they simply won’t take in anymore, regardless of the form or type. Q: I am confused on what creatine actually does and how it makes your muscles bigger. From what I am told, it
Related Questions
- Online books are too hard to read - they don look like regular print books, and they are hard to scroll through. Does Safari do anything to make this easier?
- What is the difference between taking regular creatine or a product like USPlabs’ Jack3d?
- If I buy a regular eBook, can I use NOOKstudy to read it?
