Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I notice that the R squared statistical value is different in Excel than in Grapher with a fit curve that goes through the origin. Can this be explained?

0
Posted

I notice that the R squared statistical value is different in Excel than in Grapher with a fit curve that goes through the origin. Can this be explained?

0

According to a variety of statistical sources, R squared cannot be calculated in the same manner when a through origin fit is selected. Excel uses the same equation regardless of whether the fit curve is forced through the origin. This results in a different R squared value in Excel. This value can occasionally be negative, so using the same equation is not a good idea when forcing a curve through the origin. Grapher uses an equation specifically designed for a through origin fit that takes into account the issues of how the line is centered. Refer to Grapher’s online help for the exact equation used in both cases.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123