Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I mean, how could only two thirds of the data that went to the IVUS lab end up being interpretable unless it was stacking up somewhere and not being read until the end of the trial?

0
Posted

I mean, how could only two thirds of the data that went to the IVUS lab end up being interpretable unless it was stacking up somewhere and not being read until the end of the trial?

0

DR. RUSSELL: I’m going to have Dr. Weissman answer that question, but it is one of the complexities of paired IVUS analysis. DR. WEISSMAN: I’m Neil Weissman. I’m a cardiologist from Washington Hospital Center. I directed the Core Lab. In terms of conflicts, I’m a full-time, salaried employee of MedStar Research Institute. Boston Scientific gave a grant to MedStar Research Institute to do this. No stock or anything like that. If you look at the compliance with the IVUS, it actually was very good. It’s about 75 percent, which is pretty typical for U.S. multi-center studies. What you’re looking at is how many patients had full, 3D volumetric analysis. In order to have that, they had to have every single millimeter throughout the stent visualized and the interface was visualized. DR. WHITE: But let me just stop you because it does say 2D, two dimensional analysis. In the next sentence it’s 53 percent for 3D. DR. WEISSMAN: Okay, but the cutoffs even with 2D, okay, we would go through. If yo

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123