Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I have seen some poor quality digital copies, isn’t a camera copy better?

0
Posted

I have seen some poor quality digital copies, isn’t a camera copy better?

0

Before digital imaging the normal duplication method was to use a camera to produce a copy print, The copy was then restored using inks, dyes and airbrushing before being re-photographed to produce a negative from which the final prints were made. All these steps resulted in a loss of quality at each stage. Digital imaging has provided a means to produce higher quality images and more scope for improvements. Producing a good reproductions requires care and poor quality results from “1 Hour Express” stores has given some bad first impressions of digital prints.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123