I Have Seen A Naturopath That Did Not Graduate From An Accredited School, What Is The Difference?
A critical public health issue that non-medical naturopaths and naturopathic physicians disagree on is the issue of licensure. Correspondence-schooled naturopaths oppose any licensure that would limit any part of their practices, which includes licensure of naturopathic physicians and dietitians. Naturopathic physicians hold that licensure is necessary because it creates accountability that protects the general public by maintaining professional standards. Licensure defines the practice of naturopathic medicine both legally and ethically. This creates a set of appropriate expectations so that an environment of trust can develop with both the general public and other medical practitioners. To this end, naturopathic medicine has made great strides in maintaining its own medical schools, its own accreditation system (recognized by the appropriate government bodies), its own licensing exam, and its own licensing laws and agencies.
Related Questions
- As an accredited institution, does the Hazelden Graduate School of Addiction Studies (HGSAS) need to fulfill any ongoing obligations to the Higher Learning Commission (HLC)?
- I Have Seen A Naturopath That Did Not Graduate From An Accredited School, What Is The Difference?
- Is the Hazelden Graduate School of Addiction Studies (HGSAS) accredited?
