I have heard of other separate PC programs for merging differently focused microscope images, cheaper too. Why can I use them instead?
These other programs are developed for microscopy but may possibly be tried for some ‘regular’ photography as well if you are prepared to spend a bit extra time doing ‘clean up’ retouch etc. But then again: You will also need a camera which can execute those differently focused shots in rapid succession. In other words: You may well rig up your own camera on a tripod, making these shots one after another, changing focus manually in between. But it takes minutes instead of seconds to do so and things are moving in the meantime. Particularly outdoors where the wind is moving the grass and the leaves and the clouds… To take portraits using this primitive strategy is almost out of question…on a regular basis. The FocOz ‘package’ gives the whole solution: It’s the best camera for this particular task plus the most efficient program available for image ‘combinations’.
Related Questions
- I don have any floppy drive on my PC to be able to make images of GHOST.EXE and other programs in the support folder which I use a lot at work. Any ideas?
- Ive heard that some graduate programs place almost exclusive emphasis on GRE scores in deciding who to admit. Is Emory such a school?
- Are there advantages compared to separate PC multimedia speaker systems?
