Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I didn’t know about any fraud; isn’t that a complete defense?

COMPLETE Defense fraud isn’t
0
Posted

I didn’t know about any fraud; isn’t that a complete defense?

0

The receiver contends that any gain received by holders of Millennium Bank CDs is not legitimate and must be returned, even if the recipients didn’t know anything about the alleged Ponzi scheme. A recipient’s lack of knowledge of any fraudulent scheme, and good faith, may be factors considered as part of defending against the receiver’s claims, but mere lack of knowledge may not be a complete defense, depending on the facts of an individual recipient’s case.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123