Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I counted on the newest X company reflex camera’s test and you’ve just published the test of an older model from Y company. Why?

0
Posted

I counted on the newest X company reflex camera’s test and you’ve just published the test of an older model from Y company. Why?

0

We should start with the fact that it takes about 3 weeks to test one reflex camera. In some special circumstances that period of time can be shortened but only at the expense of allotting more editors to work on a given device’s test. It also happens that testing takes even longer as not all the editors, employed by us, work full time. Now, please, imagine such a situation: a Polish distributor gets the first specimen of a product from a new production line. They can lend it to us for 3 weeks and then see its test published on our page. During the same period of time, though, that device can be tested by 3-4 other editorial teams – the distributor will have more tests published and they can profit more from such a situation. It’s not so hard to guess which option will be chosen, then. The next problem is the planning of the editors’ working time. It often happens that an editor ends one test and reports that he needs some new equipment for the next one. In that particular moment none

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123