Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I believe that Councillor Coleman was at least open-minded enough to have gone to the presentation by the Seattle preservasionist engineer, did he not?

0
Posted

I believe that Councillor Coleman was at least open-minded enough to have gone to the presentation by the Seattle preservasionist engineer, did he not?

0

Perhaps it was information gleaned at the 11th hour at the meeting that prompted his absence from the last vote on the Johnson Street Bridge… Councillor Madoff may very well have just saved herself from certain electoral doom in 2011 by prudently voting with the leader of the opposition, Councillor Geoff Young. Councillor Chandler also seemed to waver, with questions about the so-called ‘counter petition process,’ but finally voted for what can only be characterised as ‘unsustainable’ replacement anyway… perhaps she is unfamiliar with contemporary practical applications of conservation theory in terms of restoration of heritage architecture? Pamela Madoff used to pride herself for her many crusades for these kinds of endangered heritage structures, so her votes to demolish the Joseph Strauss bridge must confuse and dismay many of her former fans… thus, this surprise vote against the ‘alternative approval process’ is counterintuitive, and indicates a rebelliousness that must drive the M

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123