Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I am purchasing a Canon 50D, and will likely upgrade to the 5D mark II later. Should i invest in EF or EF-S lenses?

0
Posted

I am purchasing a Canon 50D, and will likely upgrade to the 5D mark II later. Should i invest in EF or EF-S lenses?

0

I personally think one should buy lenses to suit their present needs. My standard lens is an EF-S 17-55 F2.8 IS USM (£600 or $1000) and that can’t be used on a full frame. I see myself going to full frame in the future but think that if I can afford full frame then I will also be able to afford selling the 17-55 and buying a new lens, if there is one better, or to probably keep the 17-55 and do the same. I would have thought you’ll be waiting a few years before full frame – you need to familiarise with the cameras and learn how to use them to their potential, only when you are at their limits upgrading. Telephoto – Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 F4 IS, Canon 70-200 F4, Sigma 70-200 F2.8, Canon 70-300 IS, Sigma 50-150 Wide Angle – Sigma 10-20, Canon 10-22, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 12-24, Tamron 11-18 In each case in the order I rate them. I have all of the first options – 17-55IS, 70-200 2.8 IS, 10-20 and they are all stunning lenses. Glass will last forever, Cameras will come and go. S

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123