How would SCOs license interact with the GPL, for the same software?
They are completely incompatible. SCO’s license explicitly denies you rights that the GPL explicitly grants you. Under SCO’s license, you agree not to modify or redistribute SCO’s Product, where the “SCO’s Product” is defined as “SCO intellectual property in Object Code format.” The GPL, on the other hand, expressly grants you the right to modify or redistribute Linux, subject to certain restrictions. This attempt to alter the terms of the licensing terminates all of SCO’s right under the GPL, including the right to redistribute Linux. Your rights under the GPL as a licensee in good faith are not affected by SCO’s forfeiture of its own rights. Furthermore, since SCO refuses to specify what parts of Linux it claims to own, you have no way to modify or redistribute the parts that SCO does not claim to own. Hence the restrictions of the SCO license effectively apply to all of Linux, including the parts that belong to others. Even if SCO identified the parts of Linux kernel that it claims
