Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How will this decision alter how the FLETC teaches Federal law enforcement — law enforcement officers?

0
Posted

How will this decision alter how the FLETC teaches Federal law enforcement — law enforcement officers?

0

Miller: Obviously sir, you know you got two people present. Both have actual authority over the place to be searched, the home for example. And, one person consents but the other refuses. You’re probably going to need judicial permission to get inside — to get inside that home. But, I’ll tell you this, you know Randolph, this case does not change the law with respect to exigencies. For example, you know, if there is no time to get a warrant, if there is no reason — if the cops don’t have time to get a warrant, then they may be able to avoid getting one. For example, if there’s probable cause to believe the time necessary to get a warrant will result in the destruction or removal of the evidence, then the police can forgo the need for a warrant. Besselman: The court also talked a little bit about domestic violence situations in its opinion. Did … I assume that would fit in some other circumstance like an exigency? Miller: Yes sir. Of course, if the police have a reasonable belief that

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123