How were comments and public feedback provided during the first rounds of public meetings integrated into the Proposed Master Plan?
Public input on this Master Planning project has come from many sources: • Public Open Houses • Questionnaires and Comment Cards • Recorded comments from the previous planning process • General correspondence: emails, letters, phone calls, etc. • Interviews with past proprietors and historians • Master Plan Advisory Council (15 member citizen group) The results from public open houses allow the project team to establish a range of what are acceptable uses for the park by the public. The results thus far have generally confirmed that the typical menu of recreational uses currently allowed at most other Colorado State Parks is deemed acceptable by the public for Staunton as well. Public input received regarding several other components of the park’s development – such as safety, traffic, access, environmental impacts and resource management – has also been recorded and investigated so that any concerns, real or perceived, can be addressed in the final Master Plan.
Related Questions
- How were comments and public feedback provided during the first rounds of public meetings integrated into the Proposed Master Plan?
- Can the public meetings conducted in 2005 to produce an area master plan be included and counted?
- Are the proposed times and stops for Commuter Bus Services open for public feedback?
How were comments and public feedback provided during the first rounds of public meetings integrated into the Proposed Master Plan?