How was the review conducted?
In undertaking the review the APVMA received information from a number of sources including scientific data packages submitted by registrants, submissions received from the public, published literature and international reports. Public submissions were received from a wide spectrum of the community, including individuals, relevant State and Territory departments, the CSIRO, environmental groups and timber industry groups. Concerns raised through the public consultation process included the potential impacts on human health, possible modes of exposure, potential effects on the environment, the availability of suitable alternatives and potential impacts on business. During the review, the APVMA consulted extensively with the registrants, representatives of the timber industry and state environment and agriculture departments. The APVMA also conferred with community representatives. In evaluating the information, the APVMA received advice from the Office of Chemical Safety in the Departme
Related Questions
- Has CDE conducted an assessment, review or evaluation of the current CDE Assessment System contract? Will this be made available under the California Public Records Act?
- Does Quorum review research that will be conducted at Canadian sites?
- Who conducted the expert panel review of the "dirty" lists and why?
