Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How Successful is Harts hybrid justification theory of punishment?

0
Posted

How Successful is Harts hybrid justification theory of punishment?

0

Instructions to writer: Need a clear account of what Hart’s theory of punishment is, in which he gives it ‘Prolegomenon to the Theory of Punishment’ in his book Punishment and Responsibility. Need to think about how it as an account of punishment as a special kind of social institution relates to his legal positivist view of what law is. The justificatory element of his theory of punishment is consequentialist, basically a crime prevention, but arguably he wants more than just merely that rather he wants people ref HLA Hart and the justification of punishment by Wesley Cragg 5 canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 43.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123