Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How should we justify charging indirect costs of an additional $650 to industry sponsors who are balking at $2500?

0
Posted

How should we justify charging indirect costs of an additional $650 to industry sponsors who are balking at $2500?

0

A. The indirect cost funds are never directly earmarked for the UMN IRB, and the indirect cost rate approved by the federal government only allows for certain pre-established exclusions such as rent, subawards over $25,000, and capital outlays. Yet, business and industry sponsored clinical trials are some of the most complex and resource demanding research reviewed by the UMN IRB. The practice of an IRB fee is consistent with the policies of peer institutions and the funds will allow the University to continue providing through, timely reviews.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123