How should a member assess whether the individual designated by the client to oversee the nonattest service possesses suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience?
Related Questions
- Is the requirement that the client possess suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience to oversee the nonattest services provided by the member a new provision?
- Why does the rule require an individual who possesses suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience to oversee the nonattest services provided by the member?
- May the client contract with a third party who is not an employee of the client to oversee or advise on the member’s performance of the nonattest service?
