Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

HOW MUCH STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE YIELDS PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE?

0
Posted

HOW MUCH STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE YIELDS PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE?

0

Exercises like the one on page 6 are useful springboards for the following discussion: “How did the user decide that a statistical significance level of 0.05 was the threshold of practical significance in the sense of a fork in the managerial decision tree?” In the day-to-day work of a practicing statistician, the user is hesitant to specify such a significance level. In such cases, the statistician serves the user well by conducting a hypothesis test and reporting the observed significance level (p-value) of the test. It is then left to the recipient of the results to decide, at leisure, what action to take based on the reported p-value (Hooke 1983), (Schervish 1996). JUST ONE MORE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE, PLEASE Newcomers to regression analysis find the temptation to add independent variables to a model almost irresistible (Kotz and Stroup 1983). Adding another independent variable increases the absolute value of the multiple correlation coefficient. Too often, such an increase becomes

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123