Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How much more effective is converting it to injectable opposed to dmso or phlogel?

0
Posted

How much more effective is converting it to injectable opposed to dmso or phlogel?

0

Since there are no studies between the two and all we have are our own experiences, So by going on many opinions of people that have used both, I’d say around 50% more effective to the transdermal or nasal form. A quote from Big Cat: “Nasal sprays and sublingual forms are also popular, and while they too have some minor success, they are the worst way to go. It’s a steroid, and with the added ester its even more lipophillic. Since the mucous membranes in the mouth and nose only let hydrophilic substances through, the rate of absorption is extremely limited. Usually to achieve this cyclodextrins are used, sugars that are lipophillic on the inside and can hold a steroid inside, but are hydrophilic on the outside, making the whole absorbable through these channels. But since fina does not have this and most of us do not possess the skills to make cyclodextrin complexes in our own kitchens, this is not a path one should consider.

0

Since there are no studies between the two and all we have are our own experiences, So by going on many opinions of people that have used both, I’d say around 50% more effective to the transdermal or nasal form. A quote from Big Cat: “Nasal sprays and sublingual forms are also popular, and while they too have some minor success, they are the worst way to go. It’s a steroid, and with the added ester its even more lipophillic. Since the mucous membranes in the mouth and nose only let hydrophilic substances through, the rate of absorption is extremely limited. Usually to achieve this cyclodextrins are used, sugars that are lipophillic on the inside and can hold a steroid inside, but are hydrophilic on the outside, making the whole absorbable through these channels. But since fina does not have this and most of us do not possess the skills to make cyclodextrin complexes in our own kitchens, this is not a path one should consider.

0

Since there are no studies between the two and all we have are our own experiences, So by going on many opinions of people that have used both, I’d say around 50% more effective to the transdermal or nasal form. A quote from Big Cat: “Nasal sprays and sublingual forms are also popular, and while they too have some minor success, they are the worst way to go. It’s a steroid, and with the added ester its even more lipophillic. Since the mucous membranes in the mouth and nose only let hydrophilic substances through, the rate of absorption is extremely limited. Usually to achieve this cyclodextrins are used, sugars that are lipophillic on the inside and can hold a steroid inside, but are hydrophilic on the outside, making the whole absorbable through these channels. But since fina does not have this and most of us do not possess the skills to make cyclodextrin complexes in our own kitchens, this is not a path one should consider.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123