Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

how much is the expenses on making the 2009 movie aliens vs monsters?

0
Posted

how much is the expenses on making the 2009 movie aliens vs monsters?

0

Monsters vs. Aliens is a 2009 computer-animated 3-D feature film from DreamWorks Animation and Paramount Pictures. The movie was the first computer animated movie to be directly produced in a stereoscopic 3-D format instead of being converted into 3-D after completion, which added $15 million to the film’s budget. The film was scheduled for a May 2009 release, but the release date was moved to March 27, 2009, to prevent competition with James Cameron’s upcoming Avatar,[1] which has since moved its release to December 2009. Monsters vs. Aliens features the voices of Reese Witherspoon, Seth Rogen, Hugh Laurie, Will Arnett, Rainn Wilson, Kiefer Sutherland, Stephen Colbert, and Paul Rudd. Directed by Conrad Vernon Rob Letterman Produced by Lisa Stewart Jill Hopper (co-producer) Latifa Ouaou (co-producer) Written by Maya Forbes Wallace Wolodarsky Rob Letterman Jonathan Aibel Glenn Berger Conrad Vernon Starring Reese Witherspoon Seth Rogen Hugh Laurie Will Arnett Rainn Wilson Kiefer Sutherla

0

http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/03/29/box-office-monsters-vs-aliens-with-almost-12k-per-3-d-screen-the-future-of-3-d-is-looking-up/ Jeffrey Katzenberg and Dreamworks Animation have definitively proven that Digital 3-D is a blockbuster format. Not only has Monsters vs. Aliens seized a monstrous $58.2M in opening weekend ticket sales, Real-D (the technology provider) and Dreamworks have revealed that $25M or so of that gross was generated specifically from 3-D and IMAX 3-D. Fox is reporting that fully 43% of the total take was from the estimated 2,218 Digital 3-D screens. That means that the Per Screen Average for the movie in 3-D was about $11,700, while the 4,800 or so traditional 35MM 2-D engagements had a Per Theatre of just an estimated $4,780. Exhibitors who figured out a way to overcome the credit crunch and pay the estimated

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123