How much has to do with Pashtun anti-Hazara discrimination?
Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy blaming the Bush administration as much as the next person. But it sounds like the government in Kabul is able to exercise some degree of influence over how the money is spent, and the longstanding discrimination of Pashtuns against Hazara is well-known and certainly not a historical anomaly limited to the Taliban years. The government in Kabul is overwhelmingly Pashtun, is it not? — captainlarab [Read captainlarab’s other letters] Permalink Monday, March 23, 2009 07:05 AM PDT There’s enough blame to go all around. I think the biggest helping of blame deserves to be heaped on the US puppet Karzai. His greatest legacy will be the absolutely terrible precedent he has set for Afghan president’s of the future. There is very little substantive progress that he can claim as his own in the 7 years he has occupied the office of the presidency. Sheet, the Taliban got more done than he. That is to say nothing of the fact that his brother is involved in drug smuggling
Related Questions
- Do Department of Justice (DOJ) Title VI implementing regulations prohibit both intentional discrimination and practices that have a discriminatory impact?
- Do other federal agencies have Title VI regulations that prohibit both intentional discrimination and practices that have a discriminatory impact?
- How much has to do with Pashtun anti-Hazara discrimination?
