Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How is U.S. policy on Tibet different from that of other Western governments like the UK?

0
Posted

How is U.S. policy on Tibet different from that of other Western governments like the UK?

0

TS: The U.S. has been more forthright when it comes to showing support for His Holiness and the people of Tibet. They never really shied away, as opposed to the British and other governments. They have been very forthright about it. That’s a big difference. In the UK there has been a change of policy because in 2008 the UK came out, stating that they recognised Tibet as part of China. Previously the UK recognised Chinese suzerainty, but not sovereignty over Tibet. The fact of the matter is that realities change all the time and China has become so much more important today than they were 10 to 15 years ago. So they are using their economic muscle to squeeze every government.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123