Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How is this study different from previous HCT studies? What are the proposed outcomes of the study?

0
Posted

How is this study different from previous HCT studies? What are the proposed outcomes of the study?

0

In 1991, the C-TRAN Board of Directors initiated a Clark County HCT Analysis conducted by the Intergovernmental Resource Center (RTCpredecessor). The purpose of the study was to determine the most appropriate HCT options and alignments to address both internal Clark County and interregional travel needs. This study focused on three corridors: I-5, I-205, and cross county (east-west corridors). The study recommended that the I-5 corridor proceed with a pre-alternative analysis study for HCT options including light rail. This became the basis for the February 1995 vote, on which Clark County residents rejected increasing taxes to finance light rail in the I-5 corridor. This study is an opportunity to take a fresh look at potential HCT corridors and types in Clark County. Current roadway congestion, growth projections, and public sentiment underscore the need to consider future HCT options for Clark County. The proposed outcome of this study is to identify an HCT system to address these a

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123