Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How is this campaign related to Seattle Ballot Initiative 97 from 2008?

0
Posted

How is this campaign related to Seattle Ballot Initiative 97 from 2008?

0

Before the I-97 campaign had a chance to turn in its signatures, a King County Superior Court judge ruled that Seattle voters have no authority to set any guidelines for the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) board. However, he did not rule against guidelines in general — he simply ruled that only the SCERS board can set the guidelines. Therefore, the current online petition campaign is aimed at convincing the SCERS board that they should adopt the language of I-97, because it is consistent with the guidelines that they themselves adopted at their December 2008 meeeting.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123