How is the relationship between the dimension table and its master data tables formed?
The columns of the dimension table that form a relationship to the master data table are defined as key fields in the master data table. To ensure that the assignment of master data tables to the dimension table is immediately apparent for a performance analysis, the dimension table is sorted and stored in the FROM clause, followed by its master data tables. For example: SELECT …..FROM /BIC/FZBCS_BC01 ” “F” -> Fact table /BIC/DZBCS_BC01T ” “DT” , -> Dimension table /BI0/SFISCVARNT ” “S44″ , -> Master data table /BI0/SFISCYEAR ” “S45” , -> Master data table For example, the S44 master data table has the FISCVARNT column as a key field. The S45 master data table has the FISCVARNT and FISCYEAR columns as its keys (columns that are contained in the dimension table as SID_0
Related Questions
- Can I use SQL Packager to package up the data differences between two tables when that table is present in both databases, but does not have a primary key?
- How is the relationship between the dimension table and its master data tables formed?
- How is the relationship between the fact table and its dimension tables formed?