Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How is it that art historians could consistently have mis-measured the height of the David?

0
Posted

How is it that art historians could consistently have mis-measured the height of the David?

0

A. I don’t know how it happened, but I can hazard a guess. It’s hard to measure the David; he is very tall. I suspect that each art historian trusted the height given by an earlier art historian. Somebody long ago made a mistake, and the mistake proliferated. Even the classic 5-volume study of Michelangelo made in the 1950’s by Charles De Tolnay is wrong. The only book I have ever found that gives the correct height is the catalogue of the Gipsoteca, a little-known collection of casts of famous Italian statues. This collection, now stored in a warehouse on the outskirts of Florence, was made in the mid-1800’s when Florence was briefly the capital of a newly united Italy. By the way, that collection includes a full-size plaster cast of the David. Q.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123