How is Feri different from other forms of the Craft?
Niklas Gander wrote an article for Witch Eye magazine that summed it up pretty neatly, at least from the point of view of the Bloodrose lines. Salient points, with my comments: — A number of variously sexual gods as opposed to a divine male-female dyad. — Non-subscription to the Wiccan Rede and Law of Threefold Return; instead, individual responsibility for the consequences of one’s actions is accepted. — “the essence of Feri is not found in a shared liturgy as much as in a shared approach to magic and the Craft” [although some lines are much more “high-church” than others, with more set liturgy–vw]. — Emphasis on spiritosexual ecstasy leading to personal development rather thanmale-female sexual polarity leading to fertility or healing. [also, there is an emphasis on bringing energy used in magickal workings back into the practitioner,rather than “grounding”–vw] — Oral tradition rather than dependent on a written tradition kept in a Book of Shadows. [Each practitioner is expect
