How far does the design argument remain a continuing proof despite its weaknesses?
Get your answer 50% from yourself and 50% from another source. First find out where, why, when, how, what about the design argument remaining a continuing proof. Then point out it’s weaknesses. See if you can find valid information from those sources of believers or the realm in which this argument stands, the reaction to the proposals of it’s weaknesses. It could be something as simple as a flick of a wrist or it could be as complicated as a web of events dating back to the origins of religion and science. Dig and dig some more. I cannot answer you.
